Elsevier

Journal of Affective Disorders

Volume 230, 1 April 2018, Pages 84-86
Journal of Affective Disorders

Natural speech algorithm applied to baseline interview data can predict which patients will respond to psilocybin for treatment-resistant depression

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2018.01.006Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Interview data from 17 patients with treatment-resistant depression was recorded.

  • Automated Emotional Analysis, a natural language processing method, was used to quantify emotional content of baseline interviews.

  • A machine learning algorithm was used to identify patterns in emotional analysis results.

  • Detected patterns predict therapeutic effectiveness of psilocybin for treatment-resistant depression.

Abstract

Background

Natural speech analytics has seen some improvements over recent years, and this has opened a window for objective and quantitative diagnosis in psychiatry. Here, we used a machine learning algorithm applied to natural speech to ask whether language properties measured before psilocybin for treatment-resistant can predict for which patients it will be effective and for which it will not.

Methods

A baseline autobiographical memory interview was conducted and transcribed. Patients with treatment-resistant depression received 2 doses of psilocybin, 10 mg and 25 mg, 7 days apart. Psychological support was provided before, during and after all dosing sessions. Quantitative speech measures were applied to the interview data from 17 patients and 18 untreated age-matched healthy control subjects. A machine learning algorithm was used to classify between controls and patients and predict treatment response.

Results

Speech analytics and machine learning successfully differentiated depressed patients from healthy controls and identified treatment responders from non-responders with a significant level of 85% of accuracy (75% precision).

Conclusions

Automatic natural language analysis was used to predict effective response to treatment with psilocybin, suggesting that these tools offer a highly cost-effective facility for screening individuals for treatment suitability and sensitivity.

Limitations

The sample size was small and replication is required to strengthen inferences on these results.

Introduction

Quantitative analyses of natural speech have undergone significant advances in recent years (Mikolov et al., 2013, Michel et al., 2011, Carrillo et al., 2015, Cambria and White, 2014)and are beginning to be applied in psychiatry (Wang and Krystal, 2014, Wiecki et al., 2015, Mota et al., 2016, Carrillo et al., 2014, Huys et al., 2011, Mundt et al., 2012). For example, automatic analysis of speech incoherence has been used as a biomarker of schizophrenia; in a proof-of-concept experiment with a small sample size, a machine learning algorithm predicted conversion to psychosis in ‘at-risk’ individuals with a 100% accuracy (Bedi et al., 2015).

In mood disorders, a recently developed measure of emotion in speech was found to accurately sort between bipolar patients and control subjects (Carrillo et al., 2016) and related tools have proved effective in identifying depression in interview-based speech (Pestian et al., 2008) and social media-based text (De Choudhury et al., 2013, De Choudhury et al., 2013). These studies highlight the power of natural language analytics to diagnose and prognose mental illness and its response to treatment.

In the present study, we sought to build on this work by testing whether natural speech analytics combined with machine learning could predict clinical responses to psilocybin in patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD), defined here as failure of at least two different antidepressants of differing pharmacology, within the same depressive episode. Psilocybin is a serotonin 2A receptor agonist and classic psychedelic drug that is currently showing promise for the treatment of a range of psychiatric conditions, including depression (Carhart-Harris and Goodwin, 2017).

Section snippets

Methods

This trial received a favorable opinion from NRES London-West London, was sponsored by Imperial College London, and was carried out in accordance with Good Clinical Practice Guidelines. It was an open-label design in which patients with TRD received two doses of psilocybin (10 mg and 25 mg) one week apart. The autobiographical memory test (AMT) (Williams and Scott, 1988) was performed by patients (n = 17) and age and sex matched matched controls (n = 18), who were recruited separately. For more

Results

Before we addressed our main question, we asked whether our method can distinguish between controls and patients. A significant between-group difference was found in the rate of positive words used in participants’ AMT interview responses, with patients using significant fewer positive words: controls AVG P = 0.0532 ± 0.013 and patients AVG P = 0.0384 ± 0.011 (t-test p = 0.0011). The AVG N did not differ significantly between both groups (p = 0.4). Using a machine learning classifier, with a 7

Discussion

In the present study, natural speech analytics combined with machine learning was able to differentiate depressed patients from healthy controls and predict responders versus non-responders in a clinical trial of psilocybin for treatment-resistant depression. The AMT interviews that produced the data on which these analyses were performed took little longer than 10 min to perform, yet were able to identify depression from health and predict treatment response with a significant level of

Acknowledgments

Robin L. Carhart-Harris is supported by the Alex Mosley Charitable Trust and that the UK MRC (MR/J00460X/1) funded the trial. Diego Fernández Slezak is sponsored by the Microsoft Faculty Fellowship 2014. MS is sponsored by James McDonnell Foundation 21st Century Science Initiative in Understanding Human Cognition.

References (20)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (29)

  • Clinical and biological predictors of psychedelic response in the treatment of psychiatric and addictive disorders: A systematic review

    2021, Journal of Psychiatric Research
    Citation Excerpt :

    The same procedure was followed in order to obtain the average negativity. Through this speech analysis, the authors showed that they could identify responders from non-responders with a significant level of 85% accuracy (Carrillo et al., 2018). One study has investigated the pre-existing state or trait markers in patients with TRD (Erritzoe et al., 2018).

  • The entropic tongue: Disorganization of natural language under LSD

    2021, Consciousness and Cognition
    Citation Excerpt :

    Indeed, in terms of screening and prediction, the most valuable data would be collected ahead of dosing sessions. The value of natural language processing for predicting treatment response is supported by a recent proof of concept study that used a machine learning classifier applied to interview data collected at baseline to differentiate and potentially predict responders from non-responders in patients suffering from major depression treated with psilocybin therapy (Carrillo et al., 2018). In conclusion, here we characterized natural language under the acute effects of LSD.

  • Can Machine Learning help us in dealing with treatment resistant depression? A review

    2019, Journal of Affective Disorders
    Citation Excerpt :

    Among the studies aiming at predicting the response to a specific treatment in a TRD population, two studies focused on response to repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) (Bailey et al., 2018, 2019), one study on the response to SSRI (Khodayari-Rostamabad et al., 2013) and one to psilocybin (Carrillo et al., 2018). Interestingly, three of these studies employed EEG features as predictors (Khodayari-Rostamabad et al., 2013; Bailey et al., 2018, 2019), while the remaining one used features extracted by an automated algorithm for quantifying the emotional content of spoken or written text (Carrillo et al., 2018). Specifically, in two subsequent studies, Bailey et al. (2018, 2019) predicted response to rTMS in a small sample of TRD by means of a combination of clinical and cognitive variables (MADRS and Working Memory accuracy) and EEG measures (alpha, theta and gamma powers; alpha theta and gamma connectivity; theta gamma coupling) assessed at baseline and after one week.

  • Rapid-acting antidepressants

    2019, Advances in Pharmacology
View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text