Elsevier

Journal of Affective Disorders

Volume 207, 1 January 2017, Pages 367-376
Journal of Affective Disorders

Research paper
Differential brain network activity across mood states in bipolar disorder

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2016.09.041Get rights and content

Highlights

  • We performed data driven analyses of functional connectivity in bipolar disorder.

  • Whole brain connectivity patterns differentiate bipolar trait and mood state.

  • Dorsal Attention Network connectivity differentiates mania and euthymia.

  • Frontal connectivity in the Default Mode Network also differentiates state & trait.

Abstract

Background

This study aimed to identify how the activity of large-scale brain networks differs between mood states in bipolar disorder. The authors measured spontaneous brain activity in subjects with bipolar disorder in mania and euthymia and compared these states to a healthy comparison population.

Methods

23 subjects with bipolar disorder type I in a manic episode, 24 euthymic bipolar I subjects, and 23 matched healthy comparison (HC) subjects underwent resting state fMRI scans. Using an existing parcellation of the whole brain, we measured functional connectivity between brain regions and identified significant differences between groups.

Results

In unbiased whole-brain analyses, functional connectivity between parietal, occipital, and frontal nodes within the dorsal attention network (DAN) were significantly greater in mania than euthymia or HC subjects. In the default mode network (DMN), connectivity between dorsal frontal nodes and the rest of the DMN differentiated both mood state and diagnosis.

Limitations

The bipolar groups were separate cohorts rather than subjects imaged longitudinally across mood states.

Conclusions

Bipolar mood states are associated with highly significant alterations in connectivity in two large-scale brain networks. These same networks also differentiate bipolar mania and euthymia from a HC population. State related changes in DAN and DMN connectivity suggest a circuit based pathology underlying cognitive dysfunction as well as activity/reactivity in bipolar mania. Altered activities in neural networks may be biomarkers of bipolar disorder diagnosis and mood state that are accessible to neuromodulation and are promising novel targets for scientific investigation and possible clinical intervention.

Introduction

Bipolar disorder is a debilitating psychiatric disorder estimated to affect between 2% and 5% of the population (Merikangas et al., 2007). It may be instructive to examine the instability of neural activity in the varying mood states in bipolar disorder for clues into the mechanisms of specific mood states and the underlying physiology of bipolar disorder itself. A growing body of scientific inquiry has examined changes in neural activity associated with specific cognitive tasks such as emotion and reward processing (reviewed in Phillips and Swartz, (2014)); Strakowski et al.(2012). Drawing upon these findings from the primarily task-based fMRI literature, we recently examined the “resting state” (rsfMRI) functional connectivity of bipolar mania when compared to bipolar euthymia (Brady et al., 2016). That analysis examined functional connectivity to brain regions selected from a consensus model of the neurobiology of bipolar disorder (Strakowski et al., 2012). We observed mood state specific aberrant connectivity between the amygdala and brain regions implicated in emotion regulation even under rest (non-task) conditions.

We sought to complement our prior study of mood related connectivity of select cortical and subcortical regions with a more data-driven analysis of functional connectivity across the entire brain. The analysis of rsfMRI has demonstrated the presence of large-scale brain networks whose function is altered in psychiatric and neurologic diseases e.g. (Baker et al., 2014, Yeo et al., 2011, Zhou and Seeley, 2014). In bipolar disorder comparatively few studies have sought to examine whole brain measures of network activity and connectivity and there is a growing call to incorporate these studies into a bipolar imaging literature that has most often examined local networks (Chase and Phillips, 2016). Several recent studies have examined large scale brain networks to differentiate bipolar disorder from other diseases (reviewed in Chase and Phillips, 2016, Lois et al., 2014).

We examined spontaneous neural activity in bipolar disorder to understand how whole brain connectivity is altered in subjects with bipolar disorder in different mood states. We compared rsfMRI data from subjects diagnosed with bipolar disorder type I in a manic state to euthymic bipolar I subjects and a healthy comparison group. We then used a data driven approach to examine changes in brain network activity across and between these groups. We measured the low-frequency oscillations of the blood-oxygen-level dependent (BOLD) signal and conducted a whole-brain analysis of the functional connectivity (FC) between all grey matter regions. We then examined FC values for significant group differences across and between groups. We chose to use an existing atlas that parcellates grey matter into regions defined by functional connectivity (Craddock et al., 2012). In doing this we hoped to capture differences in large scale network activity that does not adhere to anatomical boundaries. While this can be accomplished by independent component analysis (ICA) (see Meda et al. (2012) for example), the method utilized here would also allow us to isolate differences in individual nodes of networks that may otherwise be broadly similar between groups.

Primarily, we hypothesized that FC measures would differentiate mood states in bipolar disorder as well as differentiating subjects diagnosed with bipolar disorder, whatever their mood state, from matched healthy comparison subjects.

Section snippets

Participants

The McLean Hospital Institutional Review Board approved the study, and all participants gave written informed consent before participating. Bipolar subjects were recruited as in our previous studies (Brady et al., 2012, Brady et al., 2016, Ongur et al., 2008). Almost all (21/23) of the manic bipolar subjects were recruited from McLean Hospital inpatient units while hospitalized for a manic episode. Euthymic bipolar patients were primarily (17/24) recruited by contacting bipolar subjects who had

Subject characteristics

Table 1 lists demographic and clinical characteristics of the study population. When grouped according to DSM criteria, bipolar subjects in a DSMIVTR defined manic state were significantly more symptomatic than subjects in a euthymic state on all symptoms scales. Increased MADRS scores in mania typically came from scores on the reduced sleep, concentration difficulties, and inner tension items. All bipolar subjects were prescribed medication. All antipsychotic medications prescribed in both

Discussion

To our knowledge, this is the first study to examine whole brain functional connectivity across the manic and euthymic states in bipolar disorder. In this data driven approach to whole brain connectivity, we observe two patterns of altered functional connectivity that differentiate mood states in bipolar disorder as well as distinguishing bipolar euthymia from a HC population:

The first of these patterns is altered functional connectivity within the dorsal attention network. For most nodes

Limitations

Several limitations of this study should be noted. First, this study is hypothesis free and does not test existing models of bipolar disorder. Rather, it may serve to complement these models. Methodological limitations include the following: In a comparison of mood states in which one state (mania) is identified with motor hyperactivity, movement artifacts are a potential confound. We have attempted to minimize the effects of movement through a combination of procedures including volume

Role of funding source

This study is funded by grants 5 K23 MH100623 (Dr. Brady), 2 R01 MH078113 (Dr. Keshavan) and 5 R01 MH094594 (Dr. Öngür) from the National Institute of Mental Health and by the Taplin Family Foundation.

Contributors

RB, MK, BC and DO designed the study and wrote the protocol. GM and AM performed data collection and management. RB and NT performed the data analysis. RB and NT undertook the statistical analysis, and RB wrote the first draft of the manuscript. All authors contributed to and have approved the final manuscript.

IRB approval

The study was approved by the McLean Hospital Institutional Review Board, and all participants gave written informed consent before participating.

Acknowledgements

We thank the subjects who participated in our study. This paper is dedicated to the memory of Roscoe Brady Sr. MD.

References (35)

  • J. Zhou et al.

    Network dysfunction in Alzheimer’s disease and frontotemporal dementia: implications for psychiatry

    Biol. Psychiatry

    (2014)
  • A. Anticevic et al.

    Ventral anterior cingulate connectivity distinguished nonpsychotic bipolar illness from psychotic bipolar disorder and schizophrenia

    Schizophr. Bull.

    (2015)
  • J.T. Baker et al.

    Disruption of cortical association networks in schizophrenia and psychotic bipolar disorder

    JAMA Psychiatry

    (2014)
  • R.O. Brady et al.

    A longitudinal pilot proton MRS investigation of the manic and euthymic states of bipolar disorder

    Transl. Psychiatry

    (2012)
  • Y. Chao-Gan et al.

    DPARSF: a MATLAB Toolbox for “Pipeline” data analysis of resting-state fMRI

    Front Syst. Neurosci.

    (2010)
  • R.C. Craddock et al.

    A whole brain fMRI atlas generated via spatially constrained spectral clustering

    Hum. Brain Mapp.

    (2012)
  • First, M.B., New York State Psychiatric Institute. Biometrics Research, D., 2007. Structured Clinical Interview for...
  • Cited by (55)

    • Why is everyone talking about brain state?

      2023, Trends in Neurosciences
    • Interleukin-6-white matter network differences explained the susceptibility to depression after stressful life events

      2022, Journal of Affective Disorders
      Citation Excerpt :

      Substantial evidence from human and animal studies also suggests that the brain can be modeled as a connectome network. It exhibits nontrivial topologic principles, such as rich-club organization, small-world properties, and modular attributes (Brady et al., 2017; Christiaen et al., 2019; Liang et al., 2018; Peng et al., 2014; Wu et al., 2020a). Unlike the previous techniques, the graph theory of the brain network considers the brain as neither a completely random network nor a completely regular network but rather an “economic” small-world network, investigating the meaningful information in the topological structure of the human brain network from the aspect of connection modes (Bullmore and Sporns, 2009; Hu et al., 2016).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text