Elsevier

Journal of Affective Disorders

Volume 204, 1 November 2016, Pages 16-23
Journal of Affective Disorders

Research paper
Broken and guilty since it happened: A population study of trauma-related shame and guilt after violence and sexual abuse

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2016.06.004Get rights and content

Highlights

  • All types of violence, not only sexual abuse, were associated with shame and guilt.

  • Shame and guilt increased with the burden of violence.

  • Women reported more shame and guilt than men did.

  • Both shame and guilt were associated with anxiety/depression.

Abstract

Background

There is increasing interest in trauma-related shame and guilt. However, much remains unknown in terms of how these emotions relate to the type of event, gender and mental health. We investigated shame and guilt in men and women following various types of severe violence and their relation to mental health.

Methods

Telephone interviews were conducted with a Norwegian general population sample (n=4529; age=18–75; response rate=42.9%). Measures included child sexual abuse, child and adult rape, severe physical violence from/between parents, severe violence from a partner and non-partners, less severe violence and non-violent trauma, the new Shame and Guilt After Trauma Scale, and the Hopkins Symptom Checklist. Analyses included t-tests and linear regressions.

Results

All types of severe violence were significantly associated with trauma-related shame and guilt (coefficients from 0.11 to 0.38, p-values <0.001). The number of violence types showed a graded relationship with both emotions. Women had significantly more shame and guilt than men did (p-values <0.001 for both emotions), which was partially explained by violence exposure. Both emotions were independently associated with mental health problems (p-values <0.001).

Limitations

The study is cross-sectional. The shame and guilt measure requires further validation.

Conclusions

The more types of violence that were reported, the higher levels of shame and guilt were. Clinicians should be aware of shame and guilt after a variety of violent events, including non-sexual violence, in both men and women and should particularly be aware of whether individuals have multiple violent experiences.

Introduction

Victims of violence and trauma tend to feel shame and self-blame (Janoff-Bulman, 1979, Stone, 1992). Much remains unknown about how trauma-related shame and guilt relate to particular events and event constellations, whether they are more frequent among women than among men, and whether both have importance for mental health.

Shame can be defined as “a painful affect, often associated with perceptions that one has personal attributes, personality characteristics or has engaged in behaviors that others will find unattractive and that will result in rejection or some kind of put-down” (Gilbert, 2000), whereas guilt can be described as “an unpleasant feeling with an accompanying belief that one should have felt, thought or acted differently” (Kubany and Manke, 1995, Kubany and Watson, 2003). Though often discussed interchangeably, shame and guilt are considered separate constructs. Guilt is generally related to the devaluation of behaviors rather than the devaluation of the self, as is the case with shame (Tangney and Dearing, 2002, Wilson et al., 2006). Gilbert (1997) emphasizes that although the purpose of both emotions is to smooth group dynamics, they do so in different ways. Shame is linked to social positioning and typically elicits submissive or avoidance behavior, whereas guilt is linked to care strategies and elicits reparation behavior. In addition, the associations of shame and guilt with mental health have been debated. Whereas shame is found to be associated with mental health problems, such problems are less consistently associated with guilt (see Tilghman-Osborne et al., 2010, for a review). These findings lead some to conclude that whereas shame is maladaptive, guilt is not (Tangney et al., 2007, Tangney et al., 1992). This view has been met with criticism (Gilbert, 1997, Luyten et al., 2002). When researchers study guilt after trauma, they generally find that guilt is associated with mental health problems, although it remains debatable whether this is because of co-occurring shame (Pugh et al., 2015). Thus, although trauma-related shame and guilt are presumably associated with mental health problems, it is less clear whether both emotions yield such associations independently of each other.

Interpersonal traumatic events, including violence, may have stronger associations with adverse outcomes than non-interpersonal events do (Green et al., 2000), possibly due to mediation by shame (La Bash and Papa, 2014). Shame and guilt have been identified after various types of violence (Andrews et al., 2000, Kubany et al., 1996, Street and Arias, 2001). Violent events may differ in ways that are pertinent to shame and guilt, including whether the event is stigmatized, as sexual abuse may be, whether the event is experienced early in life, and whether it occurs in close relationships. Theories on why these aspects have particular importance for shame and guilt include the internalization of stigma (Amstadter and Vernon, 2008, Finkelhor and Browne, 1985), the early development of schema (Lee et al., 2001), and threats to the social self (Budden, 2009). Two studies with university samples have found that sexual abuse entails more shame and guilt than other traumas do (Amstadter and Vernon, 2008) and that the age when sexual abuse begins may influence shame (Uji et al., 2007).

In addition, exposure to various types of violence often overlaps (Classen et al., 2005, Herrenkohl and Herrenkohl, 2009). Thus, researchers increasingly focus on the total burden of violence in relation to adverse outcomes (Finkelhor et al., 2007). Recent small studies of undergraduates (La Bash and Papa, 2014), outpatients with PTSD (Hagenaars, Fisch, and van Minnen, 2011) and male refugee minors (Stotz et al., 2015) suggest that the number of traumatic events may be associated with shame and guilt. However, to our knowledge, no studies have investigated shame and guilt after different events in a large population sample.

When overall proneness to shame and guilt is considered, women have been found to have somewhat higher levels of both emotions (see Else-Quest et al., 2012, for a meta-analysis). However, less is known about gender differences when shame and guilt occur in relation to trauma and violence. In terms of exposure to violence, women more often experience severe intimate partner violence (IPV) and sexual violence (Creamer et al., 2001, Fischer, 1992, Tolin and Foa, 2002), which may be relevant for shame and guilt. A potential gender difference in trauma-related shame and guilt may be due to some aspect of the difference between men and women (e.g., biology, coping style) or some aspect of the event (e.g., sexual abuse, perpetrator relationship).

One study found that women scored higher on some, but not other, subscales of trauma-related guilt (Kubany et al., 1996). In another study, women experienced more negative social feedback after trauma (Andrews et al., 2003), which could imply an increased risk; however, several studies have found no or mixed gender differences (Aakvaag et al., 2014, Andrews et al., 2000, Byers and Glenn, 2011). Many studies of trauma-related shame and guilt are restricted to one gender and target events that are gendered (Beck et al., 2011, Leskela et al., 2002, Street and Arias, 2001). Thus, whether women experience more trauma-related shame and guilt is not known, although existing evidence indicates that gender differences are small or non-existent after the same type of trauma.

Several instruments to measure shame and/or guilt exist (e.g. Harder and Zalma, 1990, Tangney et al., 1997), but few are adapted to measure these emotions after trauma. Those that exist are typically suitable for use with survivors of a particular trauma or for patient groups (Kubany et al., 1996, Øktedalen et al., 2014). Therefore, there is a need for a measure of trauma-related shame and guilt in general population samples.

This study aimed to investigate how gender and violence experiences relate to shame and guilt and how shame and guilt relate to mental health in a large, population-based study of violence and abuse.

The research questions were as follows:

  • 1.

    Does our scale measure trauma-related shame and guilt as separate constructs, and do women report more of both these emotions than men do?

  • 2.

    Are shame and guilt associated with different types of violence and with the number of violence types?

  • 3.

    Are trauma-related shame and guilt independently associated with anxiety/depression symptoms?

Section snippets

Participants and procedure

The sample comprised 2437 women and 2092 men (age 18–75; mean age: 44.4 years). Potential participants were randomly selected from the General Population Registry, which contains all citizens of Norway. All potential participants received invitation letters and were later called by interviewers. The response rate was 42.9% (45.0% for women, 40.8% for men), calculated from those who were reached by telephone (comparable to response rate calculation for random digit dialing). For more information

Results

The confirmatory factor analysis supported the hypothesis that shame and guilt as measured by the SGATS are two separate latent constructs (CFI: 0.986, TLI: 0.981, RMSEA: 0.076). The four shame items loaded on the shame factor in the 0.79–0.96 range, whereas the five guilt items loaded on the guilt factor in the 0.82–0.92 range. The model-based correlation between shame and guilt in the CFA was 0.87, whereas the empirical Pearson correlation between the corresponding scale scores in the data

Discussion

All types of severe violence (CSA, rape before and after 18, severe physical violence from and between parents, severe violence from a partner and from non-partners in adulthood) were significantly associated with both shame and guilt. In addition, most of these associations were deemed clinically relevant. The more types of violence respondents reported, the more trauma-related shame and guilt they experienced. Gender was significantly associated with both emotions after adjustment for

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

References (64)

  • C. Tilghman-Osborne et al.

    Definition and measurement of guilt: implications for clinical research and practice

    Clin. Psychol. Rev.

    (2010)
  • H.F. Aakvaag et al.

    Shame and guilt in the aftermath of terror: the Utøya Island study

    J. Trauma. Stress

    (2014)
  • A.B. Amstadter et al.

    Emotional reactions during and after trauma: a comparison of trauma types

    J. Aggress. Maltreat. Trauma

    (2008)
  • B. Andrews et al.

    Gender, social support, and PTSD in victims of violent crime

    J. Trauma. Stress

    (2003)
  • B. Andrews et al.

    Predicting PTSD symptoms in victims of violent crime: the role of shame, anger, and childhood abuse

    J. Abnorm. Psychol.

    (2000)
  • B. Andrews et al.

    Predicting depressive symptoms with a new measure of shame: the experience of shame scale

    Br. J. Clin. Psychol.

    (2002)
  • I.A.E. Bicanic et al.

    Predictors of delayed disclosure of rape in female adolescents and young adults

    Eur. J. Psychotraumatol.

    (2015)
  • D. Bögner et al.

    Impact of sexual violence on disclosure during Home Office interviews

    Br. J. Psychiatry

    (2007)
  • G.A. Bonanno et al.

    When the face reveals what words do not: facial expressions of emotion, smiling, and the willingness to disclose childhood sexual abuse

    J. Pers. Soc. Psychol.

    (2002)
  • E.S. Byers et al.

    Gender differences in cognitive and affective responses to sexual coercion

    J. Interpers. Violence

    (2011)
  • C.C. Classen et al.

    Sexual revictimization: a review of the empirical literature

    Trauma Violence Abuse

    (2005)
  • M. Creamer et al.

    Post-traumatic stress disorder: findings from the Australian National Survey of Mental Health and Well-being

    Psychol. Med.

    (2001)
  • K. Cunningham

    Personal Communication to Helene Flood Aakvaag

    (2015)
  • K. Cunningham

    Shame and Post-traumatic Stress Disorder. (Dissertation for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy)

    (2015)
  • L.R. Derogatis et al.

    The Hopkins Symptom Checklist (HSCL): a self-report symptom inventory

    Behav. Sci.

    (1974)
  • N.M. Else-Quest et al.

    Gender differences in self-conscious emotional experience: a meta-analysis

    Psychol. Bull.

    (2012)
  • P. Fayers et al.

    Quality of Life: The Assessment, Analysis and Interpretation of Patient-reported Outcomes

    (2007)
  • D. Finkelhor et al.

    The traumatic impact of child sexual abuse: a conceptualization

    Am. J. Orthopsychiatry

    (1985)
  • G.J. Fischer

    Gender differences in college student sexual abuse victims and their offenders

    Sex. Abuse

    (1992)
  • P. Gilbert

    The evolution of social attractiveness and its role in shame, humiliation, guilt and therapy

    Br. J. Med. Psychol.

    (1997)
  • P. Gilbert

    The relationship of shame, social anxiety and depression: the role of the evaluation of social rank

    Clin. Psychol. Psychother.

    (2000)
  • L. Goodman et al.

    Assessing traumatic event exposure: general issues and preliminary findings for the Stressful Life Events Screening Questionnaire

    J. Trauma. Stress

    (1998)
  • Cited by (76)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text