Research paper
Changes in mood stabilizer prescription patterns in bipolar disorder

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2016.01.043Get rights and content

Highlights

  • We studied prescription drug trends in bipolar disorder 2007–2013.

  • Lithium prescription decreased in both bipolar disorder type I and II.

  • The use of lamotrigine and quetiapine increased in both bipolar subtypes.

  • Valproate use decreased in bipolar II disorder, and olanzapine use decreased in women.

  • The prescription of antidepressants increased somewhat but only in bipolar I disorder.

Abstract

Background

Lithium is a first line treatment option in bipolar disorder, but several alternative treatments have been introduced in recent years, such as antiepileptic and atypical antipsychotic drugs. Little is known about how this has changed the prescription patterns. We investigated possible changes in the use of mood stabilizers and antidepressants in Sweden during 2007–2013.

Methods

Data was collected from Swedish registers: the National Quality Assurance Register for bipolar disorder (BipoläR), the Prescribed Drug Register, and the Patient Register. Logistic regression models with drug use as outcomes were used to adjust for confounding factors such as sex, age, year of registration, and subtypes of bipolar disorder.

Results

In both bipolar subtypes, lithium use decreased steadily during the study period, while the use of lamotrigine and quetiapine increased. The use of valproate decreased in bipolar II disorder and the use of olanzapine decreased among women. The use of antidepressant remained principally unchanged but increased somewhat in bipolar I disorder.

Limitations

We only report data from 2007 as the coverage of BipoläR prior to 2007 was too low to allow for reliable analyses.

Conclusion

Significant changes in the prescription of drugs in the treatment of bipolar disorder have occurred in recent years in Sweden. Further studies are needed to clarify whether these changes alter the outcome in bipolar disorder.

Introduction

Bipolar disorder affects around 1.5% of the population (Altshuler et al., 2010) and entails high costs for the society, mainly due to long periods of sick leave (Ekman et al., 2013). The course of the disorder varies considerably between individuals. Some patients are free from affective recurrences for decades, while others frequently recurrent into severe manic or prolonged depressive episodes (Goodwin, 2007). While some persons recover completely between mood episodes, others suffer persisting, debilitating symptoms. The subdivision into bipolar disorder type I and II is established but not undisputed (Akiskal, 1996, Akiskal et al., 2000, Cassano et al., 1989, Cassano et al., 1992, Paris, 2009), and bipolar disorder type II does not exist as a diagnosis of its own in ICD-10.

In addition to treatment for acute depressive and manic episodes, there is effective prophylactic treatment available for bipolar disorder. It has been known for more than half a century that lithium effectively prevents new episodes (Geddes and Briess, 2007, Goodwin, 2002, Goodwin and Geddes, 2003), and lithium is still recommended as a first line maintenance treatment option according to national and international treatment guidelines (APA, A.P.A., 2002, Goodwin, 2009, NCCMH, 2006, SBU, 2004, Suppes et al., 2005, Yatham et al., 2013, Yatham et al., 2009). Lithium is known as a mood stabilizer. The definition of mood stabilizer is a treatment that is effective against either depression or mania without increasing the risk for an opposite episode. Some antipsychotic drugs are effective against mania, but may increase the risk of depression (Goikolea et al., 2013, Tohen et al., 2003, Zarate and Tohen, 2004). Contrariwise, antidepressant drugs may trigger mania when given as monotherapy to bipolar patients (Viktorin et al., 2014). In addition to lithium, several other drugs have now been proven effective not only for treatment of acute episodes but also for prophylaxis and are included among first line treatment options. Thus, besides lithium the mood stabilizer group comprises some antiepileptic drugs (valproate, carbamazepine, lamotrigine) and some atypical antipsychotic drugs (quetiapine, olanzapine, aripiprazole) (Coryell, 2009).

It has been suggested that the classic manic-depressive disorder with euphoric manias and full recovery between recurrences would respond particularly well to lithium (Dilsaver et al., 1993, Keller et al., 1993), while persons with mixed episodes and persons with rapid cycling would respond better to valproate (Bowden, 1995, Calabrese et al., 1996, Freeman et al., 1992, Swann et al., 1997). Olanzapine is prescribed mostly for mania but may also be used for acute bipolar depression in combination with fluoxetine (Taylor et al., 2014, Yatham et al., 2013). Lamotrigine is considered primarily to protect against depressive recurrences (Calabrese, 2004, Calabrese et al., 2003a, Calabrese et al., 2008, Calabrese et al., 2003b, Frye et al., 2000) and could therefore earn its place when preventing mania is less critical, as in bipolar disorder type II. Quetiapine is used for both depression and mania, but is also the only medication with indication acute treatment of bipolar depression. The use of standard antidepressants to treat bipolar depression is controversial and the evidence base is inconclusive (Pacchiarotti et al., 2013, Sidor and Macqueen, 2011, Taylor et al., 2014, Yatham et al., 2013). Quetiapine might therefore be more likely to be prescribed to patients with predominantly depressive episodes, which is mostly the case in bipolar II disorder. Hence, a possible increased prescription of drugs with antidepressant profile (such as lamotrigine or quetiapine) might stem from changes in case-mix or diagnostic shifts with respect to bipolar subtypes.

Bipolar disorder has received increased attention in the 2000s, not least because of the launching of new treatments. It is not known if this has affected the prescription pattern. The purpose of this study was therefore to study possible changes in the prescription of mood stabilizers and antidepressants for bipolar disorder during the period 2007–2013.

Section snippets

Sources of data and study population

Data were derived from the Swedish national quality assurance register for bipolar disorders (BipoläR). BipoläR, established in 2004, contains individualized data concerning case-mix, medical interventions, and treatment outcomes. Data is typically collected by the treating physician and entered into a web-based application. Participation in this register is voluntary for the clinician as well as the patients, even though there have been incentives from health care providers to increase the

Results

Demographic and clinical characteristics of the BipoläR-cohort (N=32,019) are summarized in Table 1. Women were overrepresented (61%). The mean (SD) age was 49.6 (15.9) years for women and 51.9 (15.3) years for men. 45% of the patients were diagnosed with Bipolar I disorder, 34% with Bipolar II disorder, 18% with Bipolar disorder NOS, and 3% with schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type. Women were more likely than men to be diagnosed with Bipolar II disorder and Bipolar disorder NOS, while men

Discussion

We used data from three national Swedish registers – the quality register BipoläR, the Prescribed Drugs Register (PDR), and the National Patient Register (NPR) – to examine prescription trends of mood stabilizers and antidepressants during the period 2007–2013. Data from BipoläR clearly showed that lithium use decreased significantly for both sexes. By contrast, lamotrigine and quetiapine use increased significantly. The use of valproate and olanzapine decreased in women but remained the same

Acknowledgments

The quality register BipoläR is financed by Swedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions (Dnr:14/6952). The study was supported by Grants from the Swedish foundation for Strategic Research (KF10-0039), the Swedish Federal Government under the LUA/ALF agreement (ALFGBG-142041), the Health & Medical Care Committee of the Regional Executive Board, Region Västra Götaland (VGFOUREG-158591), and the Swedish Medical Research Council (K2014-62X-14647-12-51 and K2010-61P-21568-01-4). We wish to

References (55)

  • H.S. Akiskal

    The prevalent clinical spectrum of bipolar disorders: beyond DSM-IV

    J. Clin. Psychopharmacol.

    (1996)
  • L.L. Altshuler et al.

    Gender and depressive symptoms in 711 patients with bipolar disorder evaluated prospectively in the Stanley Foundation bipolar treatment outcome network

    Am. J. Psychiatry

    (2010)
  • APA, A.P.A.

    Practice Guidelines for Treatment of Patients with Bipolar Disorder- Revision

    (2002)
  • C.L. Bowden

    Predictors of response to divalproex and lithium

    J. Clin. Psychiatry

    (1995)
  • J.R. Calabrese et al.

    Latest maintenance data on lamotrigine in bipolar disorder

    Eur. Neuropsychopharmacol.

    (2003)
  • J.R. Calabrese et al.

    Predictors of response to mood stabilizers

    J. Clin. Psychopharmacol.

    (1996)
  • J.R. Calabrese et al.

    Lamotrigine in the acute treatment of bipolar depression: results of five double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials

    Bipolar Disord.

    (2008)
  • J.R. Calabrese et al.

    A placebo-controlled 18-month trial of lamotrigine and lithium maintenance treatment in recently depressed patients with bipolar I disorder

    J. Clin. Psychiatry

    (2003)
  • G.B. Cassano et al.

    Psychopathology, temperament, and past course in primary major depressions. 2. Toward a redefinition of bipolarity with a new semistructured interview for depression

    Psychopathology

    (1989)
  • W. Coryell

    Maintenance treatment in bipolar disorder: a reassessment of lithium as the first choice

    Bipolar Disord.

    (2009)
  • S.C. Dilsaver et al.

    Depressive mania associated with nonresponse to antimanic agents

    Am. J. Psychiatry

    (1993)
  • M. Ekman et al.

    The societal cost of bipolar disorder in Sweden

    Soc. Psychiatry Psychiatr. Epidemiol.

    (2013)
  • T.W. Freeman et al.

    A double-blind comparison of valproate and lithium in the treatment of acute mania

    Am. J. Psychiatry

    (1992)
  • M.A. Frye et al.

    A placebo-controlled study of lamotrigine and gabapentin monotherapy in refractory mood disorders

    J. Clin. Psychopharmacol.

    (2000)
  • J.R. Geddes et al.

    Bipolar disorder

    Clin. Evid. (Online)

    (2007)
  • J.R. Geddes et al.

    Lamotrigine for treatment of bipolar depression: independent meta-analysis and meta-regression of individual patient data from five randomised trials

    Br. J. Psychiatry J. Ment. Sci.

    (2009)
  • F.K. Goodwin

    Rationale for long-term treatment of bipolar disorder and evidence for long-term lithium treatment

    J. Clin. Psychiatry

    (2002)
  • Cited by (63)

    • Mini-review: Anomalous association between lithium data and lithium use

      2022, Neuroscience Letters
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, in Sweden, a study of mood-stabilizing drugs’ prescriptions in bipolar disorder between 2007 and 2013 showed a decrease of lithium from 51% to 41%, as well as that of valproate (from 18% to 14%) and olanzapine (from 21% to 17%). On the other hand, an increase was noted for lamotrigine (from 25% to 33%) and quetiapine (from 9% to 25%) [57]. Similarly, in Denmark, the rate of lithium prescription in 2000–2011 diminished from 41.1% to 34%, and in 2011, it was exceeded by lamotrigine (increase from 3.4% to 42.1%), and by quetiapine (the increase from 0 to 39.5%).

    • Lithium treatment of Bipolar disorder in adults: A systematic review of randomized trials and meta-analyses

      2022, European Neuropsychopharmacology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Lithium is still the gold standard of bipolar therapies, and it is still widely used, in spite of recent advances in the field and the increased use of antipsychotics and specific antiepileptics,. However, it is true that its use is steadily declining (Karanti et al., 2016; Kessing et al., 2016; Parabiaghi et al., 2015), but peculiarly, it tends to be used for longer times than most alternatives (Baldessarini et al., 2008, 2007, 2019) Lithium is a rare chemical element with atomic number 3 and its symbol is ‘Li’.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text