Elsevier

Journal of Affective Disorders

Volume 193, 15 March 2016, Pages 215-226
Journal of Affective Disorders

Review article
Systematic review of research on railway and urban transit system suicides

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2015.12.042Get rights and content

Highlights

  • The quality of rail suicide research varies greatly; better research is needed.

  • Rail suicides resemble people who use other methods, but are younger.

  • Rail suicides are rarely impulsive; people usually go to the rails to kill themselves.

  • Media reports on railway suicides can increase their incidence.

  • We need more research on why people choose railway suicide.

Abstract

Introduction

We critically review research on railway suicides to inform suicide prevention initiatives and future studies, including who is at risk and why, and behaviours at track locations.

Method

Literature was identified from Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar and our documentation centre, and contacting 71 railway companies, resulting in 716 articles and eight unpublished reports, with 94 having empirical data on 55 unique studies. Research quality was critically assessed.

Results

The quality of studies varies greatly with frequent shortcomings: no justification of sample size, lacking information on the reliability and validity of measures, no explanation nor theoretical understanding of findings. Railway suicides resemble closely people who use other methods, although they tend to be younger. As with other suicide methods, mental health problems are likely to be present. Railway suicide attempters usually die, but most urban transportation systems attempters survive. Railway suicides are rarely impulsive; people usually go to the railway for the purpose of killing themselves. Hotspots have been the focus of some prevention measures. We know little about why people choose railway suicide, but studies of survivors suggest they often thought they would have an immediate, certain and painless death. Media reports on railway suicides can increase their incidence.

Conclusions

Most research focuses on the incidence and characteristics of events and attempters. Research has not shown that railway suicides are different from suicides by other means. Better quality research is needed, particularly studies that investigate why people use railways to kill themselves and how railway suicides can be effectively prevented, as well as more evaluations of prevention programmes. Because of significant variations by country and region in characteristics of railway suicides, prevention programmes should conduct a local assessment of the characteristics of attempters and incidents.

Practical implications

We need more research on indicators of suicide risk in attempters on railway property, and studies of how suicidal people on railway property are prevented from suicide. Changing beliefs and attitudes about railway suicides, reducing media reports, offering help onsite, controlling access at hotspots and better staff training in mental health facilities near tracks are promising prevention strategies. However, local specificities must be considered in planning prevention strategies.

Introduction

Suicides occur in most railway and metro transportation systems worldwide. They represent from 1.7% of all suicides in Canada (Mishara and Bardon, 2013) to 12.3% of suicides in the Netherlands (van Houwelingen and Baumert et al., 2013). The only railway systems without suicides are the few which have physical barriers that effectively block all passenger access to the tracks. Railway suicide has a major social and economic cost to witnesses, railway companies (traumatised employees, delays in traffic and costs) and first responders. There are several efforts to reduce the incidence of railway suicides. The International Union of Railways (IUC) has produced a series of recommendations for the selection and implementation of railway suicide prevention strategies (http://www.uic.org/). (Havârneau et al., 2015) recently conducted a systematic review of safety measures to prevent railway suicides and trespassing accidents. These measures include technical (access to tracks, design of platforms and trains), behavioural (identification of at risk persons on railway property and in the community) and social interventions (inter-organisation collaboration, public information and education, enforcement). Unfortunately, few of these measures have been evaluated to assess their effectiveness in reducing railway suicides (Havârneanu et al., 2015). This article presents a systematic review of research on railway and urban transit system suicides, including studies on the incidence, temporal and spatial patterns of attempts as well as characteristics of attempters. This review emphasizes commonalities in railway suicides around the world as well as regional and local difference that may have important implications for prevention. We discuss implications of characteristics of railway suicides for stakeholders in developing prevention strategies based on current recommended best practices (Harvâneanu et al., 2015). We also discuss needs for further research to better understand railway suicide and to develop effective prevention programmes.

Section snippets

Methodology

We searched the databases listed in Table 1 sequentially with the key words indicated. The number or articles consists of unique articles identified that were not previously identified in other databases. To identify unpublished reports, we contacted 71 railway companies around the world. Of the 25 replies, 17 had no data on railway suicide and eight sent a report. Four of the reports included data already published elsewhere and 4 provided new data and were included in this review. Inclusion

Definition of railway suicide

Suicides are defined as instances where there are clear behavioural indications that the victim intended to initiate actions that could lead to his death or the victim presented risk factors and warning signs generally associated with suicide, such as suicide threats, leaving a note, having previously attempted suicide or having mental health problems with indications of suicide risk (Mishara and Tousignant, 2004). Railway suicides generally involve intentionally putting oneself in the path of

Methods of classification of railway suicides, their reliability and validity

The determination of deaths as accidents or suicides is not easy. For example, in Canada from 1993 to 1996, Transport Canada (1996) classified 39% of railway “trespassing” fatalities as being “apparent suicide,” 10% as accidents and the remaining 51% as “undetermined”. In the USA, Martino et al. (2013) found it difficult to obtain accurate data on railway suicides. Berman et al. (2013) identified discrepancies in reporting, inducing a risk of underestimation.

Mishara and Bardon (2013) found that

Incidence and prevalence

Table 2 summarises the incidence of railway suicides in different countries where data are available and the proportion of suicides on railway, based upon our calculations, comparing the data reported in the article with national suicide data from the World Health Organization (2014). There are significant variations that may reflect actual differences or may be influenced by differences in the methods of reporting and classifying deaths. The proportion of all suicides that occur on railways

References (69)

  • H. Radbo et al.

    Suicides and other fatalities from train-person collisions on Swedish railroads: a descriptive epidemiologic analysis as a basis for systems-oriented prevention

    J. Saf. Res.

    (2005)
  • A. Silla et al.

    Main characteristics of train-pedestrian fatalities on Finnish railroads

    Accid. Anal. Prev.

    (2012)
  • G. Sonneck et al.

    Imitative suicide on the Viennese subway

    Soc. Sci. Med.

    (1994)
  • C.A.J. van Houwelingen et al.

    Train suicide mortality and availability of trains: a tale of two countries

    Psychiatry Res.

    (2013)
  • C.A.J. van Houwelingen et al.

    Seasonal changes in 24-h patterns of suicide rates: a study on train suicides in The Netherlands

    J. Affect. Disord.

    (2001)
  • C.A.J. van Houwelingen et al.

    Mental healthcare status and psychiatric diagnoses of train suicides

    J. Affect. Disord.

    (2008)
  • C.A.J. van Houwelingen et al.

    Train suicides in The Netherlands

    J. Affect. Disord.

    (2010)
  • C.A.J. van Houwelingen et al.

    Mental healthcare status and psychiatric diagnoses of train suicides

    J. Affect. Disord.

    (2008)
  • R. Abbott et al.

    Railway Suicide: An Investigation of Individual and Organisational Consequences: A Report of the SOVRN (Suicides and Open Verdicts on the Railway Network) Project

    (2003)
  • K. Andriessen et al.

    Railway suicide in Belgium 1998–2009: incidence and prevention

    Crisis

    (2012)
  • G. Arsenault-Lapierre et al.

    Psychiatric diagnoses in 3275 suicides: a meta-analysis

    BMC Psychiatry

    (2004)
  • C. Bardon et al.

    Prévention du Suicide Dans le Métro de Montréal, Phase 2- Analyse de Contenu des Dossiers du Coroner 2000–2008

    (2013)
  • C. Bardon et al.

    Prévention du suicide dans le métro de Montréal, Phase 1 - Description des gestes suicidaires dans le métro de Montréal à partir des dossiers d'incident

    (2013)
  • A. Battistini et al.

    Train-related suicides in Milan, Italy: analysis of cases 1993-2008

    Med. Sci. Law

    (2009)
  • J. Baumert et al.

    Ten-year incidence and time trends of railway suicides in Germany from 1991 to 2000

    Eur. J. Public Health

    (2005)
  • A. Berman et al.

    Defining Characteristics of Intentional Fatalities on Railway Rights-of-way in the United States, 2007–2010

    (2013)
  • J.L. Botha et al.

    Suicides on Commuter Rail in California: Possible Patterns – A case study

    (2010)
  • R.A. Cocks

    Study of 100 patients injured by London underground trains 1981–6

    Br. Med. J.

    (1987)
  • D. De Leo et al.

    Suicidal behaviour by train collision in Queensland, 1990–2004

    Aust. N. Z. J. Psychiatry

    (2008)
  • K. Debbaut et al.

    Characteristics of suicide hotspots on the Belgian railway network

    Int. J. Inj. Control. Saf. Promot.

    (2014)
  • E.A. Deisenhammer et al.

    Railroad suicides and attempted suicides in Austria 1990–1994. Extending the hypothesis mass media transmission of suicidal behavior

    Nervenarzt

    (1997)
  • B. Emmerson et al.

    Train suicides in Brisbane, Australia, 1980–1986

    Crisis

    (1993)
  • E. Etzerdorfer et al.

    Preventing suicide by influencing mass-media reporting. The Viennese experience 1980–1996

    Arch. Suicide Res.

    (1998)
  • R. Farmer et al.

    Suicide in the London underground system

    Int. J. Epidemiol.

    (1991)
  • Cited by (28)

    • A pilot study evaluating the effectiveness of preventing railway suicides by mid-track fencing, which restrict easy access to high-speed train tracks

      2022, Journal of Safety Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      Some studies also showed an effect regarding trenches located in-between the tracks, or so called “suicide pits” (Barker et al., 2017; Coats & Walter, 1999; O’Donnell & Farmer, 1994). However, there is currently limited evidence concerning other types of prevention measures through means restriction in the railway system (Ryan et al., 2018) and there is a need to develop better evidence for suicide prevention strategies and methods (Fredin-Knutzén et al., 2020; Mishara & Bardon, 2016). In a previous study, Rådbo and Andersson (2012) investigated suicides and other trespass fatalities in the railway system of greater Stockholm and its urban areas.

    • Identifying measures with the highest potential to reduce suicides on Finnish railways

      2022, Applied Ergonomics
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, caution is recommended when considering the suitability of our study findings for other countries. For example, the locations of railway suicides vary significantly by country (see e.g., Mishara and Bardon, 2016) and each country has their unique railway environment. As mentioned as part of the introduction, the length of the Finnish railway network is almost 6000 km, and unlike in some other countries, railways are not usually isolated from the surrounding areas by fencing.

    • Self-harm on roads: Register-based study of methods and characteristics of individuals involved

      2021, Journal of Affective Disorders
      Citation Excerpt :

      The latter have received far more attention in terms of both research and prevention (Mishara and Bardon, 2016; Barker et al, 2017). Those dying by suicide on the rail network appear to be similar to those dying on the road network, such as often being relatively young compared with people dying by suicide in general, and often with problems with substance misuse and a history of previous suicide attempts involving other methods (Mishara and Bardon, 2016). However, there is little information regarding non-fatal acts in on the rail network, probably because of their generally high case fatality, but some on survivors of suicide attempts on the underground, who report that their acts were often impulsive but involved high suicide intent (O'Donnell et al., 1996).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text