Elsevier

Journal of Affective Disorders

Volume 166, September 2014, Pages 151-155
Journal of Affective Disorders

Research report
Dimorphic changes of some features of loving relationships during long-term use of antidepressants in depressed outpatients

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2014.04.043Get rights and content

Abstract

The present study aimed at investigating the possible changes of some features of loving relationships during long-term treatment of depression with both selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and tricyclics (TCAs), by means of a specifically designed test, the so-called “Sex, Attachment, Love” (SALT) questionnaire.

The sample was composed by 192 outpatients (123 women and 69 men, mean age±SD: 41.2±10.2 years), suffering from mild or moderate depression, according to DSM-IV-TR criteria, that were selected if they were treated with one antidepressant only for at least six months and were involved in a loving relationship.

The results showed that SSRIs had a significant impact on the feelings of love and attachment towards the partner especially in men, while women taking TCAs complained of more sexual side effects than men. These data were supported also by the detection of a significant interaction between drug and sex on the “Love” and “Sex” domains.

The present findings, while demonstrating a dimorphic effect of antidepressants on some component of loving relationships, need to be deepened in future studies.

Introduction

In the last decades, the use of antidepressants, particularly of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) has increased progressively, so that nowadays they represent one of the most commonly prescribed drugs in the medical practice (Bauer et al., 2008, Pratt et al.,). This is due to different factors, such as their indication and significant effectiveness in both depression and anxiety disorders, coupled with fewer side effects and lower toxicity/lethality, as compared with older antidepressants (Stahl, 2008). Currently, the wide use of SSRIs has been also promoted by the easier recognition and prompter psychiatric diagnoses, as well as acceptance of psychotropic medications by patients and clinicians (Borch Jacobson, 2002, Paulose-Ram et al., 2007, Olfson and Marcus, 2009). Undoubtedly, if on one side SSRIs are very effective in improving some negative and debilitating symptoms of depression, on the other, they seem to dampen some rewarding and joyful emotions (Barnhardt et al., 2004). Therefore, nowadays a greater concern is emerging that SSRIs may provoke previously unrecognized side effects, such as cognitive and/or emotional blunting and apathy. In the scientific literature, such effects have been also named SSRIs-induced indifference, but disagreements exist on how to label this phenomenon (Wongpakaran et al., 2007, Price et al., 2009). Some reports are available showing that patients treated for long periods with SSRIs experience decreased emotional response to both aversive and pleasurable events. Taken together, such data would indicate that SSRIs would blunt positive emotions and potentially alter personality (Hoehn-Saric et al., 1990; Kramer, 1993, Opbroek et al., 2002, Sansone and Sansone, 2010). Although depressed patients may suffer from anhedonia even after clinical remission (Raskin et al., 2012), emotional blunting seems to be a different phenomenon strictly related to SSRI intake (Price and Goodwin, 2009).

At the moment, as there are no large epidemiological studies on this topic, data on the prevalence rate of SSRIs-induced emotional blunting should be interpreted with caution. In one study (Bolling and Kohlenberg, 2004) 16.1%, out of a total of 161 depressed patients were reported to suffer from loss of ambitions, while in another (Fava et al., 2006) the prevalence was between 30% and 40%. Other studies carried out in smaller samples provided the same data (Opbroek et al., 2002, Sato and Asada, 2011). The rate in anxiety disorder seems to be lower (5%), but the sample was constituted by children only (Reinblatt and Riddle, 2006). Further, other observations in children and adolescents confirmed the phenomenon in these populations (Murphy et al., 2000, Garland and Baerg, 2001).

Besides the little data on the magnitude of the phenomenon, its pathophysiology is largely unknown and different hypotheses have been put forward to explain it. According to some authors, it could be due to the inhibitory influence of serotonin (5-HT) on the dopaminergic system (Barnhart et al., 2004), or on the frontal lobe and interference with the reward system (Harmer, 2008, Harmer et al., 2003a, Harmer et al., 2003b, Abler et al., 2012). Recently, interesting suggestions came from a study showing that a treatment with citalopram decreased the neural processing of reward and aversive stimuli in healthy subjects (McCabe et al., 2010), although it should be underlined that the effects of antidepressants may be different in healthy conditions and pathological states (for review, see Serretti et al., 2010).

Given the paucity of information on this topic and the total absence of data in our country, the aim of this paper was to explore and compare the eventual changes of some components of loving relationship during a long term-treatment of depression with SSRIs and tricyclics (TCAs). For this purpose, we developed a specific instrument, the so-called “Sex, Attachment, Love” questionnaire (SALT) (Appendix 1: translation into English of the original questionnaire in Italian). The possible differences between men and women were examined as well.

Section snippets

Subjects and materials

The study sample included 192 outpatients (123 women and 69 men, mean age±SD: 41.2±10.2 years) who were recruited amongst a large cohort of patients suffering from mood disorders at the outpatient unit of the Dipartimento di Medicina Clinica e Sperimentale, Section of Psychiatry, at Pisa University. They were selected on the basis of a primary diagnosis of major depression, according to DSM-IV-TR American Psychiatric Association (APA, 2000) criteria, and assessed by the Structured Clinical

Instrument

The Sex–Attachment–Love Test (SALT) is a 40 items self-report questionnaire aimed at exploring the possible variations of three dimensions typical of loving relationships, that is to say, sex, attachment and love.

The SALT is scored on a three points likert scale, where 3 (answer “a”) represents “less than before”, 2 (answer “b”) “as before”, and 1 (answer “c”) “more than before”. “Before” is to be intended as “before the beginning of the psychopharmacological treatment”.

The instrument was

Statistical analyses

SALT questionnaires were considered valid if they contained less than 10% missing items. Comparison of parametric data was carried out with ANCOVA to adjust for age, and that of percentage of answers with chi-square analysis. Three two-way factorial ANCOVA analyses were used to study the effect of gender and drug, included the possible interaction between them, on each dimension. As the interaction was significant, we continued the analysis within the therapeutic groups.

All statistical

Results

All patients included in the study returned the SALT questionnaires that were correctly fulfilled and therefore could be processed.

Seventy-six women and 33 men were taking one SSRI, while 48 women and 36 men one TCA. No inter- or intragroup significant differences were detected in terms of length of the psychopharmacological treatment, or of loving relationship, as well as of type of work and education. The mean drug doses and the mean HRSD total scores were similar in all groups and subgroups.

Discussion

Currently, an increasing attention is being directed towards the emergence of emotional side effects, the so-called “emotional blunting” or “apathy” or “indifference”, following the use of SSRI antidepressants (Barnhardt et al., 2004; Nutt et al., 2007; Wongpakaran et al., 2007, Price et al., 2009). However, no systematic study has been carried out to explore the real prevalence of this phenomenon. In addition, the majority of data was gathered in small samples of patients that are not easily

Role of funding source

The funding source had no such involvement.

Conflict of interest

None.

Acknowledgment

No acknowledgments.

References (55)

  • DSM IV-TR, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

    (2000)
  • W.J. Barnhardt et al.

    SSRI-induced apathy syndrome: a clinical review

    J. Psychiatr. Pract.

    (2004)
  • M.Y. Bolling et al.

    Reasons for quitting serotonin reuptake inhibitor therapy: paradoxical psychological side effects and patient satisfaction

    Psychother. Psychosom.

    (2004)
  • M. Borch Jacobson

    Psychotropicana

    (2002)
  • J. Bowlby

    Attachment and Loss: Attachment

    (1969)
  • J. Bowlby

    Attachment and Loss. Separation: Anxiety and Anger

    (1973)
  • J. Bowlby

    Attachment and Loss: Loss, Sadness and Depression

    (1980)
  • M. Bozon et al.

    Sexual initiation and gender in Europe: a cross-cultural analysis and trends in the 20th century

  • K.A. Brennan et al.

    Attachment Theory and Close Relationships

    (1998)
  • R.S. Cimbalo et al.

    Sex differences in romantic love attitudes among college students

    Psychol. Rep.

    (1993)
  • P.T. Costa et al.

    The five-factor model of personality and sexual functioning in outpatient men and women

    Psychiatr. Med.

    (1992)
  • H.J. Eysenck

    Personality and sexual adjustment

    Br. J. Psychiatry

    (1971)
  • H.J. Eysenck

    Personality and sexual behaviour

    J. Psychosom. Res.

    (1972)
  • M. Fava et al.

    A cross-sectional study of the prevalence of cognitive and physical symptoms during long-term antidepressant treatment

    J. Clin. Psychiatry

    (2006)
  • M.B. First et al.

    Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV-TR Axis I Disorders, Research Version, Patient Edition. (SCID-I/P)

    Biometrics Research

    (2002)
  • H.E. Fisher et al.

    Romantic love: a mammalian brain system for mate choice

    Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci.

    (2006)
  • E.J. Garland et al.

    Amotivational syndrome associated with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in children and adolescents

    J. Child Adolesc. Psychopharmacol.

    (2001)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text