How effective is a psychological intervention program for patients with refractory bipolar disorder? A randomized controlled trial
Abstract
Background
The aim of this research was to evaluate the short-term and long-term efficacy of a combined treatment (pharmacological + psychoeducational and cognitive-behavioral therapy) as compared with a standard pharmacological treatment in patients with refractory bipolar disorder.
Method
40 patients were randomly assigned to one of the following: Experimental group under combined treatment, and Control group under pharmacological treatment. We used an analysis of variance (ANOVA), including one or two factors, with repeated measures at different evaluation times: baseline, post-treatment, 6-month follow-up and 12-month follow-up.
Results
We found significant between-group differences at all evaluation times after the treatment. The experimental group showed less hospitalizations than the control group in the 12-month evaluation (p
=
0.007) as well as lower rates of depression and anxiety in the 6-month valuation (p
=
0.015; p
=
0.027) and the 12-month evaluation (p
=
0.001; p
<
0.001). Significant differences in relation to mania and inadaptation emerged in the post-treatment evaluation (p
=
0.004; p
<
0.001) and were sustained throughout the study (p
=
0.002, p
<
0.001; p
<
0.001, p
<
0.001). Analysis of within-group differences in the Experimental group showed reduction of mania (p
<
0.001), depression (p
=
0.001), anxiety (p
=
0.003) and inadaptation (p
<
0.001) throughout the study; while in the Control group, it showed increased numbers of hospitalizations (p
=
0.016), as well as higher rates of mania (p
=
0.030), anxiety (p
<
0.001) and inadaptation (p
=
0.003).
Conclusions
Our results suggest that a combined treatment is effective in patients with refractory bipolar disorder. Suggestions for future research are commented on.
Keywords: Refractory bipolar disorder, Combined therapy, Pharmacological treatment, Psychoeducation, Cognitive-behavioral model, Long-term follow-up
To access this article, please choose from the options below
PII: S0165-0327(10)00319-8
doi:10.1016/j.jad.2010.03.026
© 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
