Journal of Affective Disorders
Volume 126, Issue 1 , Pages 80-87, October 2010

How effective is a psychological intervention program for patients with refractory bipolar disorder? A randomized controlled trial

  • Ana González Isasi

      Affiliations

    • Psychiatry Department, Hospital Universitario Insular, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Hospital Universitario Insular de Gran Canaria, Servicio de Psiquiatría, Avenida Marítima s/n, 35016—Las Palmas, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain. Tel.:+34 928441551; fax: +34 928441555.
  • ,
  • Enrique Echeburúa

      Affiliations

    • Faculty for Psychology, Universidad del País Vasco, CIBERSAM, San Sebastián, Spain
  • ,
  • José María Limiñana

      Affiliations

    • Unidad de Investigación, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario Insular Materno-Infantil, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain
  • ,
  • Ana González-Pinto

      Affiliations

    • CIBERSAM, Psychiatry Department, Hospital Santiago Apóstol, Vitoria, Spain

Received 24 August 2009; received in revised form 26 March 2010; accepted 26 March 2010.

Abstract 

Background

The aim of this research was to evaluate the short-term and long-term efficacy of a combined treatment (pharmacological + psychoeducational and cognitive-behavioral therapy) as compared with a standard pharmacological treatment in patients with refractory bipolar disorder.

Method

40 patients were randomly assigned to one of the following: Experimental group under combined treatment, and Control group under pharmacological treatment. We used an analysis of variance (ANOVA), including one or two factors, with repeated measures at different evaluation times: baseline, post-treatment, 6-month follow-up and 12-month follow-up.

Results

We found significant between-group differences at all evaluation times after the treatment. The experimental group showed less hospitalizations than the control group in the 12-month evaluation (p=0.007) as well as lower rates of depression and anxiety in the 6-month valuation (p=0.015; p=0.027) and the 12-month evaluation (p=0.001; p<0.001). Significant differences in relation to mania and inadaptation emerged in the post-treatment evaluation (p=0.004; p<0.001) and were sustained throughout the study (p=0.002, p<0.001; p<0.001, p<0.001). Analysis of within-group differences in the Experimental group showed reduction of mania (p<0.001), depression (p=0.001), anxiety (p=0.003) and inadaptation (p<0.001) throughout the study; while in the Control group, it showed increased numbers of hospitalizations (p=0.016), as well as higher rates of mania (p=0.030), anxiety (p<0.001) and inadaptation (p=0.003).

Conclusions

Our results suggest that a combined treatment is effective in patients with refractory bipolar disorder. Suggestions for future research are commented on.

Keywords: Refractory bipolar disorder, Combined therapy, Pharmacological treatment, Psychoeducation, Cognitive-behavioral model, Long-term follow-up

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0165-0327(10)00319-8

doi:10.1016/j.jad.2010.03.026

Journal of Affective Disorders
Volume 126, Issue 1 , Pages 80-87, October 2010