Journal of Affective Disorders
Volume 126, Issue 1 , Pages 46-48, October 2010

A factor analysis of different temperament domains in a border region in rural Southern California

  • Alvaro Camacho

      Affiliations

    • Sun Valley Behavioral and Research Center, Imperial, CA, United States
    • Imperial County Behavioral Health, El Centro, CA, United States
    • Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, United States
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Sun Valley Behavioral and Research Center, Imperial, CA, United States.
  • ,
  • Alan N. Simmons

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, United States
    • Veterans Health System Administration, La Jolla, CA, United States
  • ,
  • Bernardo Ng

      Affiliations

    • Sun Valley Behavioral and Research Center, Imperial, CA, United States
    • Imperial County Behavioral Health, El Centro, CA, United States
    • Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, United States
  • ,
  • Scott C. Matthews

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, United States
    • Veterans Health System Administration, La Jolla, CA, United States
  • ,
  • Hagop S. Akiskal

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, United States
    • Veterans Health System Administration, La Jolla, CA, United States

Received 26 February 2010; accepted 15 March 2010.

Abstract 

Background

Temperament has been described as an oligogenic model that confers attributes to individuals in their daily functioning. Understanding of these temperaments can help understanding psychiatric status and therapeutic needs of a patient population. As the Latino population grows providers need to become more familiar with their psychiatric status.

Objective

To describe how the characteristics of different temperament domains in a community vs a private practice clinic of patients being treated for a mood disorder.

Methodology

Retrospective record review was conducted in 117 patients with mood disorders who received the Temperament Scale (TEMPS). Forty nine were from a community clinic (CM) and 68 from a private practice (PP).

Results

The following temperament domains were found. In PP: depressed 17/69 (25%); cyclothymic 18/69 (26%); hyperthymic 16/69 (23%); anxious 14/68 (20%); irritable 4/69 (5%). Among CM: depressed 10/49 (20%); cyclothymic 14/49 (28%); hyperthymic 8/49 (16%); anxious 15/49 (30%); irritable 2/49 (5%). Using factor analysis to determine the significant domains among clinics, cyclothima (0.82) and irritability (0.81) were the most relevant, regardless of psychosocial background and language differences.

Limitations

Cross-sectional retrospective study without longitudinal follow up.

Conclusion

This study elucidates how temperament domains could be considered a valuable tool in evaluating patients in mood disorders clinic. The tool elucidates valuable characteristics that could be applied for guidance in diagnosis and treatment without being biased by different socio-cultural background or language differences. The factor analysis helps elucidate the pertinence of TEMPS scores that may not be the focus of clinical intervention although they contribute significantly to the structure of an individual's temperament, specifically emotional labiality (i.e., cyclothima and irritability).

Keywords: Temperament, Rural, Cyclothymia

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0165-0327(10)00306-X

doi:10.1016/j.jad.2010.03.013

Journal of Affective Disorders
Volume 126, Issue 1 , Pages 46-48, October 2010