Journal of Affective Disorders
Volume 122, Issue 1 , Pages 27-38, April 2010

Asenapine in the treatment of acute mania in bipolar I disorder: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

  • Roger S. McIntyre

      Affiliations

    • University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. University of Toronto, University Health Network, 399 Bathurst Street, MP 9-325, Toronto, ON, Canada M5T 2S8. Tel.: +1 416 603 5279; fax: +1 416 603 5368.
  • ,
  • Miriam Cohen

      Affiliations

    • Merck, Summit, NJ, United States
  • ,
  • Jun Zhao

      Affiliations

    • Merck, Summit, NJ, United States
  • ,
  • Larry Alphs

      Affiliations

    • Employed at Pfizer Global Research and Development, Ann Arbor, MI, United States, at the time of this study
  • ,
  • Thomas A. Macek

      Affiliations

    • Employed at Pfizer Global Research and Development, Ann Arbor, MI, United States, at the time of this study
  • ,
  • John Panagides

      Affiliations

    • Merck, Summit, NJ, United States

Received 13 October 2009; received in revised form 15 December 2009; accepted 29 December 2009.

Abstract 

Background

Asenapine is indicated in adults for acute treatment of manic or mixed episodes associated with bipolar I disorder with or without psychotic features. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial assessed the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of asenapine in bipolar I disorder.

Methods

Adults experiencing manic or mixed episodes were randomized to 3weeks of flexible-dose treatment with sublingual asenapine (day 1: 10mg BID, 5 or 10mg BID thereafter; n=185), placebo (n=98), or oral olanzapine (day 1: 15mg QD, 5–20mg QD thereafter; n=205). Primary efficacy, YMRS total score change from baseline to day 21, was assessed using ANCOVA with last observation carried forward.

Results

Mean daily doses were 18.4mg asenapine and 15.9mg olanzapine. Least squares mean changes in YMRS total score on day 21 were significantly greater with asenapine than placebo (−11.5 vs −7.8; P<0.007), with advantage seen as early as day 2 (−3.2 vs −1.7; P=0.022). Changes with olanzapine on days 2 and 21 also exceeded placebo (both P<0.0001). YMRS response and remission rates with olanzapine, but not asenapine, exceeded those of placebo. Incidence of EPS-related adverse events was 10.3%, 3.1%, and 6.8% with asenapine, placebo, and olanzapine, respectively; incidence of clinically significant weight gain (7.2%; 1.2%; 19.0%). Mean weight change (baseline to endpoint) was 0.9, 0.1, and 2.6kg with asenapine, placebo, and olanzapine, respectively.

Limitations

As this short-term study was designed for comparisons with placebo, any comparisons between asenapine and olanzapine should be interpreted cautiously.

Conclusions

Asenapine was superior to placebo in reducing YMRS total score and was well tolerated.

Keywords: Asenapine, Bipolar I disorder, Manic or mixed episodes, Olanzapine

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0165-0327(10)00007-8

doi:10.1016/j.jad.2009.12.028

Journal of Affective Disorders
Volume 122, Issue 1 , Pages 27-38, April 2010