Journal of Affective Disorders
Volume 119, Issue 1 , Pages 92-99, December 2009

Abnormal response to failure in unmedicated major depression

  • Katie M. Douglas

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychological Medicine, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Department of Psychological Medicine, University of Otago, Christchurch, PO Box 4345, Christchurch, New Zealand. Tel.: +64 3 3720400; fax: +64 3 3720407.
  • ,
  • Richard J. Porter

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychological Medicine, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand
  • ,
  • Christopher M. Frampton

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychological Medicine, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand
  • ,
  • Peter Gallagher

      Affiliations

    • Institute of Neuroscience (Psychiatry), University of Newcastle, UK
  • ,
  • Allan H. Young

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Canada

Received 13 January 2009; received in revised form 19 February 2009; accepted 21 February 2009.

Abstract 

Background

An aspect of neuropsychological impairment which has been linked specifically to depression is an abnormal response to failure. That is, a rapid deterioration of performance after receiving feedback that an error was made on the previous task. We aimed to examine this phenomenon in unmedicated, depressed outpatients.

Methods

Forty-four patients meeting DSM-IV criteria for major depression, all psychotropicmedication-free for at least six weeks, and 44 demographically matched, healthy control participants completed a computerised simultaneous/delayed matching-to-sample task (S/DMTS).

Results

Patients with depression were significantly less accurate than controls on the S/DMTS task. Both groups augmented their performance after an error had been made. The probability of making an error following an error was significantly greater in depressed compared with control participants, even when total number of errors was controlled for. Response latencies reduced significantly after an error had been made for both groups.

Limitations

Both groups made relatively few errors. This reduced the power of analysis particularly when examining the effect of delay.

Conclusions

The abnormal response to negative feedback previously identified in depressed samples was replicated in the current unmedicated, less severely depressed group. The impairment shown in the depressed sample may be due to a reduction in the motivating effect of an error compared with healthy controls. This has possible relevance to both neurobiological and psychological theories of depression.

Keywords: Depression, Neuropsychology, Cognitive impairment, Working memory, Reaction time, Psychomotor performance

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Department in which work was done. Department of Neurology, Neurobiology and Psychiatry, University of Newcastle, UK.

PII: S0165-0327(09)00087-1

doi:10.1016/j.jad.2009.02.018

Journal of Affective Disorders
Volume 119, Issue 1 , Pages 92-99, December 2009