Journal Home
Search for

Volume 115, Issue 1, Pages 215-219 (May 2009)


View previous. 28 of 41 View next.

Variation in brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) gene is associated with symptoms of depression

Laramie E. DuncanaCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Kent E. Hutchisonb, Gregory Careya, W. Edward Craigheadc

Received 14 July 2008; received in revised form 26 August 2008; accepted 26 August 2008.

Abstract 

Background

Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) is putatively involved in the pathophysiology of depression. This study examined associations between BDNF genotype at the Val66Met locus, depression symptoms, and serum BDNF levels.

Methods

Twenty-eight subjects in the primary study (25 female, 3 male) completed diagnostic interviews, self-report questionnaires, and provided blood samples for serum BDNF quantification and buccal cell samples for genotyping. Data from a second sample of 189 subjects (94 female, 95 male) were also analyzed.

Results

The Val/Val genotype was associated with higher scores on the Cognitive-Affective factor of the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) in the primary sample. No evidence was found for association between genotype and serum BDNF in this sample. Consistent with the primary study, Val/Val genotype was associated with higher total BDI-II scores, Cognitive-Affective factor scores, and Somatic-Vegetative factor scores, in the second sample. Serum BDNF measures were not available for the second sample.

Limitations

The mechanism through which BDNF genotype translates into (putative) differences in depression symptoms is not known.

Conclusions

In contrast to case–control association studies, we demonstrate two changes in the operationalization of the phenotype. Additionally, we found an association between Val/Val genotype and higher levels of depression symptoms. This result is distinct from an association between BDNF genotype and diagnosis of depression, and it may help to clarify our understanding of genetic liability to depression, which will ultimately lead to more nuanced and effective treatment strategies.

a University of Colorado at Boulder, United States

b University of New Mexico, United States

c Emory University, Atlanta, United States

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Department of Psychology, Muenzinger D244, 345 UCB, Boulder, CO 80309-0345, United States. Tel.: +1 303 819 8952; fax: +1 303 492 2967.

PII: S0165-0327(08)00355-8

doi:10.1016/j.jad.2008.08.016


View previous. 28 of 41 View next.