Research report
Effectiveness of short-term and long-term psychotherapy on work ability and functional capacity — A randomized clinical trial on depressive and anxiety disorders

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2007.08.005Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

Insufficient evidence exists about the effect of different therapies on work ability for patients with psychiatric disorders. The present study compares improvements in work ability in two short-term therapies and one long-term therapy.

Methods

In the Helsinki Psychotherapy Study, 326 outpatients with depressive or anxiety disorder were randomly assigned to long-term and short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy, and solution-focused therapy. The patients were followed for 3 years from the start of treatment. Primary outcome measures were the Work Ability Index (WAI), the Work-subscale (SAS-Work) of the Social Adjustment Scale (SAS-SR), Perceived Psychological Functioning Scale, the prevalence of patients employed or studying, and the number of sick-leave days.

Results

Work ability was statistically significantly improved according to WAI (15%), SAS-Work (17%), and Perceived Psychological Functioning Scale (21%) during the 3-year follow-up. No differences in the work ability scores were found between two short-term therapies. The short-term therapies showed 4–11% more improved work ability scores than long-term therapy at the 7 month follow-up point. During the second year of follow-up, no significant differences were found between therapies. After 3 years of follow-up, long-term therapy was more effective than the short-term therapies with 5–12% more improved scores. No differences in the prevalence of individuals employed or studying or in the number of sick-leave days were found between therapies during follow-up.

Conclusions

Short-term therapies give benefits more quickly than long-term therapy on work ability but in the long run long-term therapy is more effective than short-term therapies. More research is needed to confirm these findings.

Introduction

Psychiatric disorders are often accompanied by problems in work functioning (Murray and Lopez, 1997). The scope of work-related problems in depressive and anxiety disorders varies from temporary deficits due to loss of energy, decreased ability to concentrate and lowered work satisfaction to impairment of work performance due to more long-term cognitive, affective and interpersonal dysfunctioning, recurrent sick-leaves and occupational disability (Adler et al., 2006, Mintz et al., 1992). Problems in work ability are important reasons for patients to apply for psychotherapy and to receive insurance subsidization of treatments. Improvement in work ability is usually regarded as one central goal of the treatment (Kessler and Frank, 1997, Lazar et al., 2006).

Psychotherapy outcome studies have so far primarily focused on measuring changes in psychiatric symptoms. The efficacy of brief psychotherapies has been demonstrated in clinical trials with short or no follow-up (Anderson et al., 1995, Barber and Ellman, 1996, Barlow and Lehman, 1996, Clarkin et al., 1996, Knekt and Lindfors, 2004). A recent study on depressive and anxiety disorders showed that symptom reduction was stronger after long-term psychotherapy than after short-term therapies (Knekt et al., in press).

However, relatively little is known about the effects of different therapies on alleviating work impairment and functional disability as there are only a few studies on the subject. According to Mintz et al. (1992), improvements in symptoms of depression appeared to occur more rapidly than improvements in the area of work. A decrease in sick-leave days following long-term, mainly psychodynamic psychotherapies, has been reported in one cohort study (Lazar et al., 2006). Trials comparing short-term therapies with waiting-list or clinical management have indicated either some positive treatment effect (O'Hara et al., 2000, Telch et al., 1995) or no effect (Mintz et al., 1992, Piper et al., 1990, Scott et al., 2000) on perceived work ability. A combination of short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy with antidepressive medication has produced better work adjustment and fewer sick-leave days than medication alone (Burnand et al., 2002). In short-term trials work outcomes were better as the duration of treatment increased from very short (1 month) to a moderate length (10 months) (Mintz et al., 1992). As far as we know, however, there are no trials comparing the effectiveness of short-term and long-term psychotherapies on work ability and functional capacity.

In this randomized trial, we studied the improvement in work ability and functional capacity due to solution-focused therapy and short-term and long-term psychodynamic psychotherapy during a 3-year follow-up in patients suffering from depressive or anxiety disorder.

Section snippets

Patients and methods

The project follows the Helsinki Declaration and was approved by the Helsinki University Central Hospital ethics council. The patients gave written informed consent. The patient sample, study design, and methods used have been described in detail elsewhere (Knekt and Lindfors, 2004) and are only summarized briefly here.

Patient enrollment and treatment received

Of the 459 eligible patients referred to the project, 381 were willing to participate in the study (Knekt and Lindfors, 2004). During the waiting time from the assessment of eligibility to baseline examination, 55 of these patients decided not to participate (Fig. 1). Of the remaining 326 patients, 97 were randomly assigned to solution-focused therapy, 101 to short-term psychodynamic therapy, and 128 to long-term psychodynamic therapy. Of the patients randomized, 26 patients assigned to

Discussion

We found improvements in the patients' self-reported capacities and resources at work, their actual performance at work, and their general psychological performance. These findings are in line with earlier studies showing that the patient's experience of improvement in his or her work ability changes soon after initiation of treatment (Adler et al., 2006, Mintz et al., 1992, Telch et al., 1995). In line with the results from a previous study (Lazar et al., 2006), the realization of work

Role of funding source

Funding for this study was provided by the Social Insurance Institution, Finland. The Institution had no further role in study design; in the collection, analysis or interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the paper for publication.

Conflict of interest

We declare that we have no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgement

The Helsinki Psychotherapy Study Group (Knekt and Lindfors, 2004) was responsible for collection of the data.

References (46)

  • ClarkinJ.F. et al.

    Psychotherapy of depression. Implications for reform of the health care system

    Arch. Gen. Psychiatry

    (1996)
  • de ShazerS.

    Putting Difference to Work

    (1991)
  • de ShazerS. et al.

    Brief therapy: focused solution development

    Fam. Proc.

    (1986)
  • GabbardG.O.

    Long-Term Psychodynamic Psychotherapy: A Basic Text

    (2004)
  • HärkänenT. et al.

    A case study in comparing therapies involving informative drop-out, non-ignorable non-compliance and repeated measurements

    Stat. Med.

    (2005)
  • HensingG. et al.

    How to measure sickness absence? Literature review and suggestion of five basic measures

    Scand. J. Soc. Med.

    (1998)
  • HoglendP.

    Brief dynamic psychotherapy: patient suitability, treatment length and outcome

    J. Psychother. Pract. Res.

    (1993)
  • HowardK.I. et al.

    A phase model of psychotherapy outcome: causal mediation of change

    J. Consult. Clin. Psychol.

    (1993)
  • IlmarinenJ. et al.

    Changes in the work ability of active employees over an 11-year period

    Scand. J. Work, Environ. Health

    (1997)
  • JohnsonL.D. et al.

    Modification of depression risk factors: a solution-focused approach

    Psychother. Theor. Res. Pract. Train.

    (1994)
  • KernbergO.F.

    A psychoanalytic theory of personality disorders

  • KesslerR.C. et al.

    The impact of psychiatric disorders on work loss days

    Psychol. Med.

    (1997)
  • KesslerR.C. et al.

    Prevalence and effects of mood disorders on work performance in a nationally representative sample of U.S. workers

    Am. J. Psychiatry

    (2006)
  • Cited by (81)

    • Long-term effectiveness of two models of brief psychotherapy for depression: A three-year follow-up randomized clinical trial

      2020, Psychiatry Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      Meeting our results, Fava et al. (2004) and Conradi et al. (2007), in their RCTs using CBT with a six-year follow-up and clinical management control groups and a ten-year follow-up with a TAU group, respectively, found that their interventions were more effective in symptomatic improvement than their control groups. Knekt et al. (2016, 2008, P. 2007) used both long-term and short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy models and identified that short-term models had a better therapeutic response up to six years after intervention than long-term psychotherapy. The long-term model was found to be more effective at reducing the depressive symptoms after seven years, progressively decreasing them until ten years.

    • Childhood adversities as predictors of improvement in psychiatric symptoms and global functioning in solution-focused and short- and long-term psychodynamic psychotherapy during a 5-year follow-up

      2018, Journal of Affective Disorders
      Citation Excerpt :

      The corresponding mean duration of days in treatment was 226 (SD = 95) in SFT, 170 (SD = 38) in SPP, and 991 (SD = 469) in LPP. Prior studies from the HPS have shown largely negligible outcome differences between the two short-term treatments, SFT and SPP, on various indices from psychiatric symptoms to work, social, and personality functioning (Knekt et al., 2008a, 2008b, 2011, 2013, 2015, 2016; Lindfors et al., 2012, 2015). However, during the first years of follow-up, both short-term therapies have produced somewhat faster improvement than LPP (ibid.).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text