Journal of Affective Disorders
Volume 74, Issue 3 , Pages 229-236, May 2003

Suicidal depressed vs. non-suicidal depressed adolescents: differences in recent psychopathology

  • János Csorba

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Adolescent Outpatient Service, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, Balassa u. 6, H-1083 Budapest, Hungary
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author
  • ,
  • Sándor Rózsa

      Affiliations

    • Department of Personality and Health Psychology, Eötvös Loránd University, Izabella u. 46, H-1064 Budapest, Hungary
  • ,
  • Júlia Gádoros

      Affiliations

    • ‘Vadaskert’ Childrens’ Psychiatric Hospital, Hûvösvölgyi út 116, H-1021 Budapest, Hungary
  • ,
  • Ágnes Vetró

      Affiliations

    • Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University of Medicine, Semmelweis u. 6, H-6725 Szeged, Hungary
  • ,
  • Emilia Kaczvinszky

      Affiliations

    • Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University of Medicine, Semmelweis u. 6, H-6725 Szeged, Hungary
  • ,
  • Emoke Sarungi

      Affiliations

    • Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University of Medicine, Semmelweis u. 6, H-6725 Szeged, Hungary
  • ,
  • Judit Makra

      Affiliations

    • ‘Vadaskert’ Childrens’ Psychiatric Hospital, Hûvösvölgyi út 116, H-1021 Budapest, Hungary
  • ,
  • Krisztina Kapornay

      Affiliations

    • Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University of Medicine, Semmelweis u. 6, H-6725 Szeged, Hungary

Received 13 December 2000; received in revised form 18 December 2001; accepted 19 December 2001.

Abstract 

Background: Few studies have focused on the differences between two depressed groups of patients in child psychiatry: the suicidal and the non-suicidal adolescent population. As in other countries, depression is one of the most prevalent diagnoses in adolescents in Hungary. Aims: The present study was designed to determine (a) whether there are specific symptoms to differentiate between two clinical samples of depressed children: patients expressing suicidal behaviour and their peers with no suicide attempts, and (b) if there are significant differences between parents’ and adolescents’ reports of the same symptoms. Methods: Using a recently developed semi-structured interview (Diagnostic Evaluation Schedule for Children and Adolescents—Hungarian version, Kovacs, 1996), 132 symptoms were assessed for two clinical groups of depressed adolescents: a suicidal group (N=51), and a non-suicidal group (N=81). The suicidal group had all made an unsuccessful suicide attempt and/or had had frequent suicidal thoughts during the 6 months prior to the study. The non-suicidal group had neither attempted suicide, nor had had suicidal thoughts during the previous 6 months. All cases were selected from a larger sample of 490 consecutively referred new outpatient children over a 1 year period in five psychiatric facilities in Hungary. Only 13–17-year-old adolescents participated in the study. Both samples were identified using operationalised computer algorithm criteria of DSM-IV major depressive disorder episode (MDD) irrespective of the current clinical diagnosis of the patients. The Pearson Chi-square test with Monte Carlo correction was used to evaluate the differences between the suicidal and the non-suicidal depressed samples. Results: Hopelessness, negative self-esteem and violent behaviour were the only significant discriminators between the two study groups according to the parent interviews, with increased problem scores in the suicidal sample compared to the non-suicidal sample. Suicidal depressed adolescents view themselves as more depressed and violent than do non-suicidal depressed individuals and were less anxious about their parents. Conclusions: The two depressed samples (suicidal vs. non-suicidal individuals) have only very few dissimilarities. There are, however, some essential differences between the parental and adolescent perceptions of the suicidal and depressive symptoms of the adolescent. The findings of the study underscore the necessity of collecting data from both the parent and the adolescent. Limitations: Cross-sectional, no lifetime psychopathology, referred samples, no blind estimation of the suicidal status of patients.

Keywords:  Semi-structured interview—differences in recent psychopathology, Two clinical samples with DSM-IV major depression syndrome: suicidal adolescents (attempters+suicide ideators) and non-suicidal depressed peers, Differences between parent and adolescent interviews

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0165-0327(02)00013-7

doi:10.1016/S0165-0327(02)00013-7

Refers to erratum:

  • Corrigendum to “Suicidal depressed vs. non-suicidal depressed adolescents: differences in recent psychopathology” [Journal Affective Disorders 74(2003)229–236]

    János Csorba, Sándor Rózsa, Júlia Gádoros, Ágnes Vetró, Emilia Kaczvinszky, Emoke Sarungi, Judit Makra, Krisztina Kapornay
    Journal of Affective Disorders 1 October 2004 (Vol. 82, Issue 1, Page 159)

Journal of Affective Disorders
Volume 74, Issue 3 , Pages 229-236, May 2003